[]
[]
Welcome to the Highland Park Public Library Online Catalog. Log in with your HPPL library card number and your PIN to register your account and create a username.

The Submission

Waldman, Amy (Book - 2012 )
Average Rating: 3.5 stars out of 5.
The Submission


Item Details

"When a Muslim architect wins a blind contest to design a Ground Zero Memorial, a city of eleven million people takes notice. Waldman, a former bureau chief for the New York Times, explores a diversity of viewpoints around this fictional event, bringing in politicians, businessmen, journalists, activists, and normal people whose lives--whether by happenstance, choice, or even due to their country of origin--get caught up in the controversy"--Chris Schluep, Amazon Best Book of the Month.
Authors: Waldman, Amy, 1969-
Title: The submission
Publisher: New York :, Picador/Farrar, Straus and Giroux,, [2012], c2011.
Edition: Pbk. ed.
Characteristics: 337 p. ;,21 cm.
Summary: "When a Muslim architect wins a blind contest to design a Ground Zero Memorial, a city of eleven million people takes notice. Waldman, a former bureau chief for the New York Times, explores a diversity of viewpoints around this fictional event, bringing in politicians, businessmen, journalists, activists, and normal people whose lives--whether by happenstance, choice, or even due to their country of origin--get caught up in the controversy"--Chris Schluep, Amazon Best Book of the Month.
ISBN: 1250007577
9781250007575
Branch Call Number: 813.6 WAL
More » MARC Display»

Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

Report This Aug 19, 2013
  • uncommonreader rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

This novel reflects the contradictions of the US and the conflicted responses to 9/11. In the end, Waldman has a positive perspective on the future. The author was at the Ottawa Writers' Festival shortly after the book was published and was impressive in her presentation of her book.

Report This Aug 02, 2013
  • oO_Oo rated this: 1 stars out of 5.

I got about 10 pages into this before I realized I read it already. It was pretty unmemorable. The characters are flat and unlikeable, the writing is stiff and the dialogue is wooden.

Report This Mar 20, 2013
  • jeanner222 rated this: 1.5 stars out of 5.

It has been two years since the terrorist attack on 9/11. A jure debates the merits of two memorials submitted to the contest; one of these will be erected to memorialize those lost on 9/11. The jury member who represents the families who lost loved ones in the attack is strident in her defense of a garden memorial. She convinces other jurors to vote for the design. And when the garden design is determined to be the winning design, the name of the submission’s architect is revealed: Mohammad Khan. Can Americans/New Yorkers accept and embrace a 9/11 memorial designed by a man with a Muslim name? Even if he is an American? Can an American with such a name be treated in post-9/11 America? People from all sides of the issue will weigh in on the memorial and its architect. Obviously, there will be controversy. This novel received a lot of hype, but I’m just not impressed by it. I guess the plot could have been interesting, if it had not been so obvious. The characters are one-dimensional, and I just could not force myself to care about them.

June Library book group selection.

Report This Jul 31, 2012
  • sldoug rated this: 3.5 stars out of 5.

Vvery well written and described with great accuracy what might have happened had this scenario (a Muslim wins a contest to design the September 11 World Trade Center memorial) actually played out, but the characters were fairly flat, which made it hard to really get into the book. Still, it was an enjoyable read and, in case anyone is looking, one particularly well suited to book clubs. I definitely wouldn't mind having people to discuss this one with.

Report This Jul 29, 2012
  • mcschroeder rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

Well-written, good character development, and good plot. I got a bit bogged down in the morass of the prejudices, processes, egos, stereotypes and politics. I ended up skimming the second half. The rest of my book club was far more positive.

Report This Jul 25, 2012
  • ReadingOntheBus rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

While it started a bit slower than other things I have been reading lately, after a bit I found myself engrossed. A thought provoking book about the prejudices and stereotypes we possess that we may not wish to acknowledge. A great read.

Report This Jul 20, 2012
  • readmorewatchless rated this: 3.5 stars out of 5.

Interesting perspective on the 911 tragedy and what could have happened. Racially charged, interesting and worth a read. I agree with valency_sterling...good but not great.

Report This Jul 09, 2012
  • valency_sterling rated this: 3.5 stars out of 5.

A good book, but shy of "very good" or "great." Even with the twist of events and such, the material didn't feel especially compelling or new. It could definitely generate a lot of discussion and be good for book clubs, but there was some certain spark missing.

Report This Jul 04, 2012
  • geezr_rdr rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

As the narrative develops we get a great description of the evils unleashed by the events of 9-11 and how these threaten the better angels of our nature. Hang on to the very end to get the full impact of this story.

View All Comments

Age

Add Age Suitability

There are no ages for this title yet.

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add a Notice

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Videos

Add a Video

There are no videos for this title yet.

Find it at HPPL

  Loading...

Powered by BiblioCommons.